COST vs SLB
Costco (COST) compared with Schlumberger (SLB).
Side by side
| Metric | $COST | $SLB |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 992.13 | 54.08 |
| 50-day SMA | 940.52 | 52.46 |
| 200-day SMA | 970.13 | 51.34 |
| Dist. to 200-day | +2.30% | +5.30% |
| RSI (14) | 62.20 | 63.40 |
| MACD | 21.15 | 0.19 |
Higher distance to the 200-day = stronger long-term trend (highlighted).
$COSTLong
$SLBLong
The read
Costco ($COST) is showing a mild uptrend (+2.3% vs its 200-day), while Schlumberger ($SLB) is showing a mild uptrend (+5.3%). On the longer-term trend measure, Schlumberger has the stronger relative position. The latest Daily Playbook reads $COST as Long and $SLB as Long.
Educational only. Not financial advice. Technicals are end-of-day · as of Oct 27, 2026.